home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
022789
/
02278900.019
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
6KB
|
122 lines
<text id=89TT0552>
<title>
Feb. 27, 1989: Knocking On Death's Door
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Feb. 27, 1989 The Ayatullah Orders A Hit
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
PRESS, Page 49
Knocking on Death's Door
</hdr><body>
<p>In covering tragedies, do journalists go too far?
</p>
<p> When serial murderer Ted Bundy was executed last month,
Detroit-area editors and news directors followed one of
journalism's most unshakable maxims: develop the local angle. In
the case of Bundy, the local hook was Caryn Campbell, a
24-year-old nurse from Dearborn, Mich., whom Bundy murdered in
Colorado in 1975. But what was second nature to most
journalists was yet another horrible reminder for the Campbell
family. "Any article or news report about Ted Bundy always
included Caryn's name and the fact that `her nude and frozen
body was found in a snowbank,'" wrote her sister, Nancy
McDonald, in a letter published in the Detroit News last week.
"It's been extremely difficult for us to accept Caryn's loss and
the way her body was found, but we, her family, did not need to
hear, see and read the same fact for 14 years."
</p>
<p> It would have been difficult to do justice to the Bundy
story without in some way describing his grisly crimes. But on
the day of his execution, did a Detroit TV station really have
to rebroadcast file footage of Campbell's 1975 funeral? Last
week 250 journalists, health-care professionals and members of
the clergy gathered in Manhattan to explore such questions at a
conference titled "Death, the Media and the Public: Needs of the
Bereaved." Sponsored by the Foundation of Thanatology, a New
York City-based organization devoted to studying bereavement, as
well as the Dallas Morning News and the Milwaukee Journal, the
three-day symposium covered everything from obituaries to the
role of "Media as Murderer." "The press has been covering crime
and death for centuries," says Texas Christian University
journalism professor Tommy Thomason, "but we are just beginning
to think about how we cover it."
</p>
<p> By most accounts, there is much room for improvement. In a
1985 survey by the American Society of Newspaper Editors, more
than 78% of the people questioned believed the press does not
"worry much about hurting people." Almost two-thirds of the
respondents agreed that journalists take advantage of victims of
circumstance. Perhaps the worst transgressor is the TV camera
operator who zooms in on the face of a dead person's relative --
and stays there as the face dissolves in grief. Says Anne
Seymour, public affairs director for the National Victim Center
in Fort Worth: "Any time there is a yellow line, some
journalists in the interest of news will cross over."
</p>
<p> When covering death, reporters and editors face a difficult
paradox: the best material in a journalistic sense very often
turns out to be what is most painful to grieving survivors. News
organizations, driven by intense competition, rarely let concern
for a victim's privacy get in the way of a scoop. The push for
live coverage of late-breaking news has put local TV stations
in the uncomfortable position of being able to broadcast word
of a person's death before the victim's family has been
officially notified.
</p>
<p> Several news organizations have responded to public
criticism by adopting new codes of behavior. WCCO-TV in
Minneapolis, for example, forbids its reporters to ask victims'
relatives how they feel. When the family of a hit-and-run
victim asked television reporters to stay away from the funeral
last month, WCCO agreed, even though its competitors did not.
Rosemary McManus, assistant editor at Long Island's Newsday in
New York, says she never sends a reporter to the home of a
victim until she is sure the family is aware of the death, and
always instructs her reporters to honor a relative's refusal to
talk. "It is one of the few situations in journalism where you
should take no for an answer," she says. (However, she does
advise the reporter to leave a business card in case the person
has a change of heart.)
</p>
<p> A different set of issues arises when reporters do gain
access to victims. Jacqui Banaszynski, a reporter for the St.
Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, won a Pulitzer Prize last year for a
lengthy series about a gay couple dying of AIDS. Privy to the
most intimate details of the lives of both the men and their
families, Banaszynski had to balance her sense of loyalty to
her subjects against her desire to make the series as truthful
as possible. "I would not print information so private that it
would harm without enhancing," she says.
</p>
<p> Reporters who are exposed to death on a regular basis can
suffer some of the same psychological effects as grieving
survivors. "Even though most reporters don't have a close
personal relationship with anyone killed," says Vanderlyn Pine, a
sociology professor at the State University of New York, "the
grief component is just as serious as (for) anyone who does."
Banaszynski says the stress from working on her series took a
toll on her physical health. Free-lance writer Joe Levine of
New York City was haunted by dreams about AIDS after he
completed a long profile of a man who was dying of the disease.
Such experiences may hold the key to improving coverage, since
reporters who have been affected by seeing death close up may
become more sensitive to the needs of the bereaved.
</p>
<p> But most journalists at last week's conference held out
little hope for reforming the way death is covered. "We have a
commercial interest in catastrophe," admits Milwaukee Journal
editor Sig Gissler. The most realistic changes that can be
hoped for, agreed the journalists, are slight improvements in
tone and treatment. Said Newsday columnist Sydney Schanberg: "If
we see only five seconds instead of 30 seconds of ghoulish film,
we've made progress."
</p>
</body></article>
</text>